
50. Paul Whiteman & George Gershwin, “Rhapsody In Blue”
(George Gershwin)
Victor 55225, 1924 · mp3
In a very real way, the Rhapsody In Blue was to jazz what Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band was to rock & roll — only, you know, better. It took the sounds, the discourse, and the bravura immediacy of the new pop form and conjured up a work that could stand with the most serious, intelligent, and highly disciplined art music of the day. In the 1920s, that was concert music; by the 1960s, it was jazz. And of course, while both works were highly praised at the time, their reputations have slipped since, as neither one is accepted by critical fascists as “real jazz” or “real rock.” The analogy breaks down after that, because of course Sgt. Pepper’s became the gold standard of album rock for two decades, while the Rhapsody had virtually no effect on jazz outside of Duke Ellington, though it did inspire a wave of jazz-influenced concert music. (Check out Milhaud’s Le Création Du Monde, Shostakovich’s Tahiti Trot, Antheil’s Jazz Symphony, Carpenter’s Skyscrapers, and Copland’s Music For The Theatre, all composed and performed, though not recorded, by 1929.) But while Sgt. Pepper’s may have been my first Beatles album, Gershwin has always had precedence. The wavering clarinet which opens the piece can still make my heart jump; I even like the schmaltzy section. Gershwin would go on to write better concert music, music which was tougher-minded while remaining true to the elegance of his jazz-pop roots — an American In Paris is much more sinewy and robust, and Porgy And Bess is indisputably the greatest American opera — but the Rhapsody In Blue was just about the last concert work to ever become truly popular (accepted, celebrated, and loved by the people) in the way Mozart, Beethoven, and Wagner had been in the centuries previous. Most people know the 1942 Ferd Grofé orchestration, but the lean, small-orchestra version that Gershwin actually wrote and performed himself, with the Paul Whiteman Orchestra in New York’s Aeolian Hall on February 12, 1924 is much, much better. When they recorded it, they sped it up and edited it in order to fit on two sides of a 78, but that just makes it sound more like jazz. It was one of the few times Whiteman’s orchestra — which did more than any other band in the nation to spread the idea of jazz — actually sounded hot, at least until Bix Beiderbecke joined up. (Technical notes: this is the 1924 version; a better-recorded 1929 version circulates more widely. For the first complete recording of the Rhapsody, see Arthur Fiedler’s 1935 Boston Pops version.)